IELTS Writing Task 1 | The underground railway systems (1 Table)

Excellent resource for the students who prepare for CD IELTS accademicc

Outstanding

40/40 :))))

Is using conclusion allowed in task 1?

Conclusion was not necessary

Super super website

Sorry in line 4 why it has been used have ing?!

Much thanks to the extra-ordinary website, but why is the model answer marked as band 8, couldn't be there a band 9 essay?

Much thanks to the extra-ordinary website, but why is the model answer marked as band 8, couldn't be there a band 9 essay?

"participle clauses" has been used in the fourth line and that's the reason of appearing "having" instead of "have".

I wonderd, whether writing conclusion in writing Task1 beneficial or not. I've supposed we shouldn't have write conclusion for Task1.

I HELPED ALOT OF READING IT, AND THANKOYU FOR YOUR CORPORATION.

Dang I almost wrote the same as the Band 8 sample answer. :)

The table shows data about the underground rail networks in six major cities. It compares the six networks in terms of their age, size and the number of people who use them each year. It is clear that the three oldest underground systems are larger and serve significantly more passengers than the newer systems.The London underground is the oldest system, having opened in 1863. It is also the largest system, with 394 kilometres of route. The second largest system, in Paris, is only about half the size of the London underground, with 199 kilometres of route. However, it serves more people per year. While the Tokyo system is only third in size, it is the most easily used, with 1927 million passengers annually.Of the three newer networks, the Washington DC underground is the most extensive, with 126 kilometres of route, compared to only 11 kilometres and 28 kilometres for the Kyoto and Los Angeles systems. The Los Angeles network is the newest, having opened in 2001, while the Kyoto netw

Conclusion in task 1 does not make sense because conclusion is generally given for opinion based task i.e. Task 2 so save it got later. Aligator.

This is a great resource.

Is using conclusion allowed in task 1?

In conclusion, I don't think "due to the large gap between the kilometers of their routes" it suits here

Amazing

At the end of the second paragraph, it stated that "While the Tokyo system is only third in size, it is the most easily used, with 1927 million passengers annually.".I really don't get why the author can claim that Tokyo is the most easily used system in the table. I am pretty sure the total band of the writing can be reduced just because of this even if other areas are strong.I must say since I am not a good writer or a reader, I am open to any answer who can justify this to me.

What about the task one for GT kelts test

The table provides information about underground railway systems in six cities, namely London, Paris, Tokyo, Washington DC, Kyoto, and Los Angeles, including their year of opening, route length, and annual passenger numbers.Overall, London has the oldest and longest underground railway network, while Tokyo carries by far the highest number of passengers each year. Most systems were developed in the 20th century, with Los Angeles being the most recent addition in the 21st century.London was the first city to introduce an underground railway system in 1863, and it remains the largest in terms of route length, covering 394 kilometres. Paris and Tokyo followed in 1900 and 1927, with networks measuring 199 km and 155 km respectively. Later, Washington DC (126 km) and Kyoto (11 km) opened in 1976 and 1981, while Los Angeles established its relatively small 28 km system in 2001.In terms of passenger usage, Tokyo records the highest figure, serving 1,927 million passengers annually, which i

Very perfect Web-side and it is comfortable for CD based questions

Where is the master writing task 2?

I wish there would be option to write, so that like other modules we could test our writing skills and know about the score

Make also overall paragraph before body para A and body para B

The table desicts data about the underground railway systems in various 6 cities in the period between 1863 and 2001.It is shown clearly from the table that Tokyo and Paris are the top two cities in the number of passengers from 1863 to 2001.In the other hand, Kyoto and Los Angeles had the lowest raio of passengers in the same time period.According to what is shown in the table, London had the longest distance in the language of route kilometres in that period.The second longest way of the route were in Paris in 1900.However, Kyoto was the smallest route of KM and the lowest passengers in 1981.To sum up, we could say that in KM of route London was the top, followed by Paris, Tokyo, and Washington DC.In the other side, Kyoto and Los Angeles were the shortest in the routes.

Am new here but I was here long time ago. I love everything here